kiaa: (Default)
[personal profile] kiaa posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
Trump is presenting the Iran ceasefire as a success, but to me it looks more like an admission that the war failed to achieve its stated goals.

The main outcome being celebrated is the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. But the strait was open before the war began, so this merely restores the previous situation after a conflict that reportedly cost tens of billions of dollars, thousands of lives, and large amounts of military equipment.

Looking at America's original objectives, it's hard to identify any clear victories. Iran's nuclear program remains unresolved, its enriched uranium stockpile is still an issue, and future negotiations will determine what happens next. The regime itself survived, despite the loss of senior figures, and appears to have been replaced by even more hardline leadership. Iran's missile arsenal was damaged but not destroyed, while its regional proxy network remains largely untouched.

Yes, Iran's conventional military took serious losses. Its air force and many military facilities were hit hard. But Tehran seems to have accepted those costs in exchange for preserving what mattered most: the regime's survival and its strategic leverage.

In fact, Iran may now hold stronger cards than before. Its ability to threaten shipping through the Strait of Hormuz demonstrated just how much influence it can exert over global energy markets. That leverage will likely shape future negotiations and may make Tehran less willing to compromise.

From my perspective, Trump was looking for a way out of a war that was becoming increasingly costly and risky. The ceasefire reduces the danger of a wider economic crisis and gives Washington an off-ramp. But if the goal was to eliminate Iran's nuclear ambitions, topple the regime, destroy its missile capabilities, or curb its regional influence, the results so far fall well short of those ambitions.

The war ended largely where it began, except that both sides are now poorer, thousands are dead, and Iran appears to have gained new bargaining power.

Þjóðhátíðardagurinn!

17 Jun 2026 12:00
abomvubuso: (Johnny Bravo)
[personal profile] abomvubuso
HAPPY BIRTHDAY, MY DEAR HOMELAND!


mahnmut: (Short cut? Must be electricity.)
[personal profile] mahnmut posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
The Iranian national team has been instructed to leave the United States hours after the end of their World Cup match against New Zealand:

LINK1 / LINK2

The Iranian team travels every day to Mexico, where their camp is based. They have no intention of staying overnight on U.S. territory.

However, that does not stop the U.S. authorities from ordering them not to do something they were never planning to do.

The only conclusion that stands out here is that the U.S. authorities want to humiliate the Iranian team.

The only thing is that the Iranian people have already humiliated the U.S. authorities, after forcing Trump to sign that Obama Iran Deal v.2.0.

Which only shows what failures Trump, the U.S. authorities, and the entire country are right now.

As for this World Cup being the worst in recorded memory (so far), and FIFA being a bunch of corrupt imbeciles, that's a whole other story.
abomvubuso: (Over the Edge)
[personal profile] abomvubuso
 


Timing is everything!

12 Jun 2026 19:43
luzribeiro: (Dog)
[personal profile] luzribeiro
An image reportedly posted by Donald Trump on his Truth Social platform has caused a stir, considering June is Pride Month. An inadvertent celebration? ;-)

THE IMAGE )

More about this HERE.
luzribeiro: (Dog)
[personal profile] luzribeiro posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
An image reportedly posted by Donald Trump on his Truth Social platform has caused a stir, considering June is Pride Month. An inadvertent celebration? ;-)



More about this HERE.
fridi: (Default)
[personal profile] fridi
In my view, Putin's Russia is heading toward an inevitable breakdown: economically, politically, administratively, and socially. The crisis is already here, and the system neither has the tools nor the willingness to deal with it.

Why am I so convinced that the regime is doomed?...
fridi: (Default)
[personal profile] fridi posting in [community profile] talkpolitics

In my view, Putin's Russia is heading toward an inevitable breakdown: economically, politically, administratively, and socially. The crisis is already here, and the system neither has the tools nor the willingness to deal with it.

In politics and society, there aren't many absolute laws like the laws of physics. But some patterns are so consistent that they might as well be laws. We know about Robert Michels' "Iron Law of Oligarchy": the idea that every organization tends to become oligarchic over time. Looking at Russia today, I think we're once again seeing what could be called the "Iron Law of Tyranny's Collapse".

Read more... )
luzribeiro: (Default)
[personal profile] luzribeiro
Donald Trump loves to say women are "too emotional" to be president, but the second a female journalist calmly challenges him on his election lies, he turns bright red, rips off his mic, and storms out of the room. Like a toddler denied a toy, he threw a tantrum and crashed out of an NBC interview rather than answer a basic question about his own claims.

Read more... )
luzribeiro: (Default)
[personal profile] luzribeiro posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
Donald Trump loves to say women are "too emotional" to be president, but the second a female journalist calmly challenges him on his election lies, he turns bright red, rips off his mic, and storms out of the room. Like a toddler denied a toy, he threw a tantrum and crashed out of an NBC interview rather than answer a basic question about his own claims.

Joyce Carol Oates nailed it: this is the face of a man who is never challenged, whose worldview is never questioned, who "literally never hears a syllable of opposition unless a journalist, usually a woman, questions him, and then he is astonished and infuriated". That's exactly what we just watched with Kristen Welker: a professional woman doing her job, and a sitting president so unused to accountability that he melted down on national TV when confronted with reality.

So let's be very clear: the person calling women "too emotional" to lead is the same man who cannot sit through a single tough interview without lashing out, crying "crooked media" and bolting for the exit. This isn't strength. It isn't leadership. It's entitlement, misogyny, and cowardice dressed up as bravado, and the only reason he gets away with it is because too many people have been trained never to tell him "no".

If Trump thinks women are too "emotional" to be president, then let's have that conversation honestly: because the only person who just lost control on national television, in front of the whole country, wasn't the woman in the room.

Kamelot - Sacrimony

6 Jun 2026 22:00
abomvubuso: (Over the Edge)
[personal profile] abomvubuso
 


abomvubuso: (Default)
[personal profile] abomvubuso

With the FIFA World Cup just around the corner, football is once again arguing about referees, VAR, handballs, offsides, and whether the referee's cousin once looked suspiciously at a player from the opposing team.

Meanwhile rugby seems to have solved a lot of this years ago.

A few ideas football could steal:

- Only the captain is allowed to speak to the referee. Everyone else who runs over waving their arms gets an automatic yellow card.
- Referee conversations with VAR are broadcast live. No more mysterious "checking possible incident..." for 5 minutes.
- Speaking of those 5 minutes... When someone is injured, or needs a substitution, etc, the clock is stopped. Let's play 2x40mins instead of 2x45, but make it "clean time".
- Anyone pretending to be injured must spend the next 10 minutes off the pitch recovering from their "serious injury". Without a substitution.
- Players who surround the referee are moved back 10 metres, rugby-style. Keep complaining and the goal is eventually awarded from the halfway line.
- Respect for officials becomes normal again instead of a revolutionary concept.
- Personally, I'd also introduce a new law (yep, in rugby they're called Laws): every fake dive earns the player a mandatory screening of their own highlights in front of the stadium after the match.

What else should football borrow from rugby?
abomvubuso: (Over the Edge)
[personal profile] abomvubuso posting in [community profile] talkpolitics

With the FIFA World Cup just around the corner, football is once again arguing about referees, VAR, handballs, offsides, and whether the referee's cousin once looked suspiciously at a player from the opposing team.

Meanwhile rugby seems to have solved a lot of this years ago.

A few ideas football could steal:

- Only the captain is allowed to speak to the referee. Everyone else who runs over waving their arms gets an automatic yellow card.
- Referee conversations with VAR are broadcast live. No more mysterious "checking possible incident..." for 5 minutes.
- Speaking of those 5 minutes... When someone is injured, or needs a substitution, etc, the clock is stopped. Let's play 2x40mins instead of 2x45, but make it "clean time".
- Anyone pretending to be injured must spend the next 10 minutes off the pitch recovering from their "serious injury". Without a substitution.
- Players who surround the referee are moved back 10 metres, rugby-style. Keep complaining and the goal is eventually awarded from the halfway line.
- Respect for officials becomes normal again instead of a revolutionary concept.
- Personally, I'd also introduce a new law (yep, in rugby they're called Laws): every fake dive earns the player a mandatory screening of their own highlights in front of the stadium after the match.

What else should football borrow from rugby?

May 2026

M T W T F S S
    123
456 78910
111213141516 17
18192021 222324
25262728293031

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 18 Jun 2026 08:58
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios